SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING RELATIVE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN A CLINICAL TRIAL
Number of patents in Portfolio can not be more than 2000
United States of America Patent
Stats
-
N/A
Issued Date -
N/A
app pub date -
Apr 26, 2017
filing date -
Aug 6, 2015
priority date (Note) -
Published
status (Latency Note)
![]() |
A preliminary load of PAIR data current through [] has been loaded. Any more recent PAIR data will be loaded within twenty-four hours. |
PAIR data current through []
A preliminary load of cached data will be loaded soon.
Any more recent PAIR data will be loaded within twenty-four hours.
![]() |
Next PAIR Update Scheduled on [ ] |

Importance

US Family Size
|
Non-US Coverage
|
Abstract
A system for determining relative operational performance in a clinical trial may include a processor, a data comparator and visualizer, and a graphical user interface. The processor filters received clinical data into multiple metric criteria to generate multiple metric data sets and filters each metric data set into a respective industry data set and a respective candidate data set. The processor then calculates statistical measures for each industry data set and candidate data set and transforms each industry data set and candidate data set based on each data set's respective statistical measures. The data comparator and visualizer compares each transformed candidate data set to the transformed industry data set for the respective metric criterion to determine a candidate percentile for each metric criterion. The graphical user interface displays the candidate percentiles for the metric criteria. A method for determining relative operational performance in a clinical trial is also described.
First Claim
all claims..Other Claims data not available
Family

- 15 United States
- 10 France
- 8 Japan
- 7 China
- 5 Korea
- 2 Other
Patent Owner(s)
Patent Owner | Address | |
---|---|---|
MEDIDATA SOLUTIONS INC | NEW YORK NY 10014 |
International Classification(s)

- 2017 Application Filing Year
- G06F Class
- 61356 Applications Filed
- 46481 Patents Issued To-Date
- 75.76 % Issued To-Date
Inventor(s)
Inventor Name | Address | # of filed Patents | Total Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Elashoff, Michael | Hillsborough, US | 45 | 364 |
# of filed Patents : 45 Total Citations : 364 | |||
Hartman, Joshua | Fort Washington, US | 12 | 128 |
# of filed Patents : 12 Total Citations : 128 | |||
Kwock, Richard | Foster City, US | 3 | 65 |
# of filed Patents : 3 Total Citations : 65 | |||
Lee, David | New York, US | 405 | 5789 |
# of filed Patents : 405 Total Citations : 5789 | |||
Savage, John | Fair Haven, US | 23 | 233 |
# of filed Patents : 23 Total Citations : 233 | |||
Schwager, Steven | New York, US | 1 | 2 |
# of filed Patents : 1 Total Citations : 2 |
Cited Art Landscape
- No Cited Art to Display

Patent Citation Ranking
- 2 Citation Count
- G06F Class
- 14.60 % this patent is cited more than
- 8 Age
Forward Cite Landscape
- No Forward Cites to Display

Maintenance Fees
Fee | Large entity fee | small entity fee | micro entity fee | due date |
---|---|---|---|---|
7.5 Year Payment | $3600.00 | $1800.00 | $900.00 | Jun 7, 2025 |
11.5 Year Payment | $7400.00 | $3700.00 | $1850.00 | Jun 7, 2029 |
Fee | Large entity fee | small entity fee | micro entity fee |
---|---|---|---|
Surcharge - 7.5 year - Late payment within 6 months | $160.00 | $80.00 | $40.00 |
Surcharge - 11.5 year - Late payment within 6 months | $160.00 | $80.00 | $40.00 |
Surcharge after expiration - Late payment is unavoidable | $700.00 | $350.00 | $175.00 |
Surcharge after expiration - Late payment is unintentional | $1,640.00 | $820.00 | $410.00 |
Full Text

Legal Events
- No Legal Status data available.

Matter Detail

Renewals Detail
